ADVERTISEMENT
Media analysts noted how quickly the story transformed from a meeting-room exchange into a referendum on immigration, patriotism, and who gets to define American values.
Some commentators praised Leavitt’s composure, emphasizing that she spoke calmly rather than theatrically, which they argue made the message resonate more strongly.
Legal scholars stressed that criticizing the government is constitutionally protected, cautioning against narratives that equate dissent with ingratitude.
