ADVERTISEMENT
In early February 2026, the global spotlight shifted once more to the enormous trove of documents tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, after the U.S.
The release, intended to increase public visibility into Epstein’s network and associations, included raw investigative materials dating back decades and mentioning numerous influential individuals.
Among the most closely watched responses has been that of Melinda French Gates, the philanthropist and former wife of Bill Gates, co‑founder of Microsoft and one of the wealthiest people in the world.
For Melinda French Gates, these disclosures have reopened personal wounds connected to her marriage and its end.
Her comments, shared in advance of the full interview’s broadcast, underscored the emotional impact of seeing references to her former husband in association with Epstein’s files.
“For me, it’s personally hard whenever those details come up because it brings back memories of some very, very painful times in my marriage,” she said, explaining that questions raised by the files should be answered by those directly involved, including her ex‑husband.
She added that she could not speak to all aspects of the newly public material, saying that she “can’t even begin to know all of it,” and that the responsibility for answering those questions lies with others.
Context: The Latest Epstein Document Release
The massive DOJ release is part of a multi‑stage disclosure process under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the Justice Department to make public the full scope of files related to Epstein’s sex trafficking crimes and network.
However, officials also acknowledged that significant portions of the files remain withheld or redacted due to the need to protect sensitive information, including victims’ identities and ongoing legal obligations.
Importantly, being named in the files does not constitute evidence of misconduct or criminal charges. Many references consist of raw investigative leads, draft emails, or documents introduced during the course of inquiries. The Justice Department has warned that the files include unverified material and that context matters when interpreting them.